United Nations Security Council Resolution 1591

UN Security Council
Resolution 1569
Date: 29 March 2005
Meeting no.: 5,153
Code: S/RES/1569 (Document)

Vote: For: 12 Abs.: 3 Against: 0
Subject: The situation concerning Sudan
Result: Adopted

Security Council composition in 2005:
permanent members:

 CHN  FRA  RUS  UK  USA

non-permanent members:
 ALG  ARG  BEN  BRA  DEN
 GRE  JPN  PHI  ROU  TAN

Darfur region of Sudan

United Nations Security Council Resolution 1591, adopted on March 29, 2005, after recalling resolutions 1547 (2004), 1556 (2004), 1564 (2004), 1574 (2004), 1585 (2005), 1588 (2005) and 1590 (2005) on the situation in Sudan, the Council placed a travel ban and asset freeze on those "impeding the peace process" in Darfur.[1]

The resolution was adopted by 12 votes in favour to none against and three abstentions from Algeria, China and Russia, who all expressed objections to the use of international sanctions and believed that the resolution failed to recognise the progress made by the Sudanese government.[2]

Contents

Observations

In the preamble of the resolution, the Council welcomed of the Comprehensive Peace Agreement in Nairobi, Kenya, by the Sudanese government and Sudan People's Liberation Army/Movement (SPLA/M). It recognised that the parties to the agreement had to bring about peace and prevent further violations of human rights and of the ceasefire in Darfur. The Security Council was also concerned about the humanitarian situation and the safety of aid workers, and called on all parties to co-operate with the African Union Mission in Darfur.

Acts

Acting under Chapter VII of the United Nations Charter, the Security Council deplored the actions of the Sudanese government, rebel and other armed groups in Darfur for failing in their commitments to the Council and continuing ceasefire violations. There were airstrikes by the government, which had also not disarmed the Janjaweed militia. In this regard, the Council established a Committee to oversee the implementation of Security Council demands against the parties involved in the conflict, and investigate individuals responsible for human rights violations.[3] It was instructed to report regularly to the Council on the situation.

The resolution placed restrictions on those "impeding the peace process" in Darfur, including a travel ban and asset freeze, to enter into force within 30 days unless the parties complied with the Security Council.[4] The Council concluded by reiterating that further measures would be taken in the event of non-compliance by any of the parties.

See also

References

  1. ^ "Security Council imposes travel ban, assets freeze on those impeding peace process in Darfur". United Nations. March 29, 2005. http://www.un.org/News/Press/docs/2005/sc8346.doc.htm. 
  2. ^ Rosenthal, Joel H. (2009). Ethics and international affairs (3rd ed.). Georgetown University Press. p. 120. ISBN 978-1589012721. 
  3. ^ König, Doris; Stoll, Peter-Tobias; Röben, Volker (2007). International law today: new challenges and the need for reform?. シュプリンガー・ジャパン株式会社. p. 80. ISBN 978-3540752042. 
  4. ^ Columbus, Frank H.; Wusu, Olufemi (2006). Politics and economics of Africa, Volume 6. Nova Publishers. p. 39. ISBN 978-1600211744. 

External links